Glenn Beck just published an Op-Ed in the New York Times arguing in favor of empathy for Black Lives Matter.
It is important to note that empathy is not a race-neutral concept. Our thoughts and emotions are grounded in the idea that whiteness is superior and normal. But since racism is a system of power imbalances, our ability to “relate” to one another is severely hindered. So empathy is not about “understanding” other people – it is about restoring, recognizing, and reflecting upon whiteness. Empathy for black people, then, requires that blackness be re-framed in terms familiar/favorable to white people, or ignored altogether.
For example: Glenn Beck is only able to “empathize” with Black Lives Matter after saying the Movement is similar to predominantly white groups (i.e. Tea Party, Bernie Supporters, Trump Supporters).
Beck “empathizes” with Black Lives Matter only after declaring a few of the members he personally met were “decent, hardworking, patriotic Americans.” These are familiar/favorable terms that align the members with racism and capitalism; thus making them a non-threat to the status quo.
To be clear: empathy is essential to human understanding and is not, in itself, problematic. But I am arguing that within the frameworks of white supremacy and anti-blackness, empathy becomes a precarious and useless concept.
In attempting to empathize with Black Lives Matter, all Beck did was draw the Movement more into the orbit of whiteness.
Empathy is white supremacy by another name.
September 7, 2016 at 9:26 pm
You mean when he met the BLM members they weren’t all yelling: “Bring me another glass of iced tea, m#####f#####!”, the way his buddy and fellow racist, Bill O’Reilly thought Black people did in restaurants? He can take a seat. 😑
LikeLiked by 1 person
September 7, 2016 at 10:24 pm
Lol – not that I’m surprised, but Bill really said he thought that!?
LikeLiked by 1 person
September 7, 2016 at 10:46 pm
Yeah, he said that. Google it. SMDH at that guy.
LikeLiked by 1 person
September 8, 2016 at 8:25 pm
Thank you for sharing this link with me, Darryl. I don’t know whether you ever read BGD? Your post reminded me of a piece on their site that speaks to the same issue. In case you’re interested: http://www.blackgirldangerous.org/2015/08/empathy-wont-save-us-in-the-fight-against-oppression-heres-why/
LikeLiked by 1 person
September 8, 2016 at 9:52 pm
Hello Alice! I have never read BDG – but this piece is great! Thanks for sharing!
LikeLiked by 1 person
October 9, 2016 at 11:20 am
Thank you for reading so many of my posts and for the follow, Darryl. I have really enjoyed reading yours as you are so articulate and plainly highly intelligent. I am grateful for the connection.
LikeLiked by 1 person
October 9, 2016 at 1:09 pm
Of course – I do not waste my subscriptions! You work is great!
Thank you so much! Make sure to follow me to stay tuned =) I post quite a bit and would love to hear your sharp feedback!
LikeLiked by 1 person
October 9, 2016 at 1:22 pm
Always gonna be there with my sharp feedback. lol I’m really quite a shy person and don’t really think much of my opinions, but when I’m blogging I become a whole different person. Not sure how that has happened! It’s good to know that you value what I have to say and that you’re even requesting it! I might not press the little follow button as I am already inundated with emails from those I already “follow”. But just because I haven’t done so, does not mean I wont be following you. I always check in regularly whether I am actively seen to be following or not. Ya get me? lol
LikeLiked by 1 person
October 9, 2016 at 1:30 pm
Great! That is much more organic and authentic! =) I really value your perspective so that means a lot to hear! I look forward to future interactions with you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
October 28, 2016 at 10:40 pm
Do you mean that people are not understanding or relating with needs and feelings of a group of people?
In that case, empathy is fading for sure. Basically, I believe in empathy as a must have to build healthy relationships with individuals or groups.
. Your observation on marginalization is right and we do need to offer alternative trades for skilled students who don’t ha ve a feel for academics. It is quite a common phenomenon, sadly, all across the world. The problem is way deeper than the color of any skin. It’s just taking long for the social acceptance of the main issue.
LikeLiked by 1 person
October 28, 2016 at 11:51 pm
I am saying that since we live in a world based on power imbalances, our ability to empathize is seriously hindered. Empathy presupposes a certain commonality between the two people/groups – but if one group is above the other, it becomes very hard to “put themselves in their shoes”.
I agree with you that empathy is fundamental for groups – I just think that we need to level the playing field for empathy to actually be genuine.
LikeLiked by 1 person
October 29, 2016 at 12:41 am
Leveling the playing field?
I haven’t known any. Even within a friend circle or organization or religious group, there is always a pyramid. Society is like a family.
Basic human rights and personal choices … Yes, they need a fair revamp on attitudes and expression/implementation of consistent relevant behaviors, across the board. (Not masked by technical/euphemistic jargon).
LikeLiked by 1 person
October 29, 2016 at 8:00 am
I agree.. society is a pyramid, and that is what needs to change. Aside from the natural parent/child relationship which is unavoidable, all other distributions of power need to be equalized.
LikeLike
January 7, 2018 at 9:46 am
I agree with this: “To be clear: empathy is essential to human understanding and is not, in itself, problematic. But I am arguing that within the frameworks of white supremacy and anti-blackness, empathy becomes a precarious and useless concept.”
But disagree with this: “Empathy is white supremacy by another name.”
I think the problem is semantics, and for me “empathy” is a scientific term, which has to do with neural networks, how they get wired together through childhood conditioning, and how we as adults, due to the neurosynaptic architecture’s plasticity, either become ever more or less empathetic (understanding others through how we would feel in their shoes) due to our ongoing thinking and behavioral patterns. In that way, empathy is both a fluid and crystallized intelligence, which basically means it comes down to our daily choices in life. How much do I truly wish to deeply probe within myself, when I feel even the slightest subconscious aversion emotion, as I think about or meet anyone I don’t know.
LikeLiked by 1 person
January 8, 2018 at 6:36 am
Hello Bent,
Thank you for the commentary. I understand what you are saying here. In your statement, you are suggesting that empathy is scientific – and position “science” as an inherently race-neutral concept. It isn’t. Consider the fact that racism, in its first and foremost manifestation, was upheld by science: folks in white lab coats swore up and down that black folks were biologically inferior. The scientific “advancements” of the Enlightenment Period were done over and against the colonization of the indigenous people and the enslavement of black people. What we call “science” is unthinkable without the histories of oppression. This is why I argue that empathy is white supremacy by another name: science was invented in the service of white supremacy, which therefore means that empathy is rooted in white supremacy.
The only way to have a TRUE form of empathy is to eradicate white supremacy.
LikeLike