I hate when dark-skinned folks go out of their way to say they are “not just black.” There are a whole list of non-black terms folks use to circumvent such an identification. The most popular ones are: “bi-racial,” “mixed,” – or even nationalities such as “Dominican.” Listen. All of that is cute, but we need to be mindful of the fact that there is a difference between how we identify and how we are identified.
Identity is an internal and individual matter. When the Census comes around, we can ‘check’ as many boxes as we’d like. We can post flags from a bunch of different countries on the bumpers of our vehicles. Theoretically, we can be as dark-skinned as Wesley Snipes but tell everyone we are “not black.”
But at the end of the day, we are over-determined by structures of power that position us from the outside. Being identified is an external and systemic matter. Quite frankly, how we identify ourselves is irrelevant to the oppressors who have already identified us. Neither our opinion nor our consent is required in a system of domination (the masses of Africans, of course, did not agree to their enslavement, but they were still slaves). We are whatever the police officer who pulls us over says we are. We are whatever the boss who can hire or fire us says we are. We are whatever the loan officer at the bank who oversees our application says we are. We can identify as “bi-racial” or “mixed” or any other non-black term our hearts desire … but none of this is connected to a system of power. The police officer, the boss, and the loan officer have the power to make sanctioned decisions over life and death. We do not. When they see us, they see niggers and treat us like them, irrespective of our ability/willingness to acknowledge it.
Thanks to advances in modern technology, DNA analysis can tell us what region(s) of the globe we are “from.” We can submit saliva samples to Ancestry.com and find that we “are,” for example: 34% European, 33% Native American, and 33% African. The results make us feel good, as individuals, but how do they help in the faces of white supremacy and anti-blackness? To be clear: I sympathize with the desire to “belong” and be “from” a place, and be situated within a historical archive. But there comes a time where we need to admit that these tests and their results are problematic for at least two reasons.
First, the very practice of using DNA technology to pinpoint where people are “from” and who they “are” re-biologizes racism. It is important to remember that racism began as a (religious) project of blood purity whereby blackness was viewed as an obvious and automatic taint to the body politic. For centuries, white folks used the register of science to legitimize their domination (i.e. eugenics). This modern-day facelift, replete with ruses of diversity, upholds and entrenches racial logic (and neoliberal capitalism) by connecting it to discourses on “identity.”
Second, it promotes a conflation of identity and lived experience. Let’s look at two hypotheticals. It is undoubtedly true that a woman with fair skin, blonde hair, and blue eyes lives the experience of whiteness. Yet, when she receives her results declaring she “is” 20% Western African – she can now say she is “bi-racial” or “mixed,” etc. This is disingenuous because at the level of experience, she still benefits from being identified as white. A gross potentiality here is that of exoticism; whereby white folks can lay claim to being members of non-white communities to “spice up their lives.” Such tests promote ignorant, non-reflexive racial understandings that are thoroughly unhinged from power. This ultimately makes it more difficult to challenge systemic racism; because it is now easier for white folks to deny their whiteness.
Similarly, a man with dark skin and kinky hair lives the experience of blackness. When a police officer sees his blackness and pulls him over for that reason and that reason only, it does not matter that he “is” 34% this or that. He has been identified as black. What now? Should he reach for his Ancestry results!? I wouldn’t advise it: that would just give the officer a reason to shoot him because – let’s face it – he was probably reaching for a gun!
Identifying as non-black is a symptom of anti-blackness. Resisting identification with blackness does not make us less likely to be identified as black. It just means we are less likely to confront a brutal reality that dominates us nonetheless.
March 16, 2017 at 3:50 pm
*Insert one million clapping emojis*
LikeLiked by 3 people
March 16, 2017 at 3:53 pm
Lol. Right on! Thank you! 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 16, 2017 at 4:03 pm
Welcome!
LikeLike
March 16, 2017 at 3:51 pm
Reblogged this on bookmarkchronicles.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 16, 2017 at 3:53 pm
I appreciate it ☺
LikeLiked by 2 people
March 16, 2017 at 4:04 pm
No problem!
LikeLike
March 16, 2017 at 4:01 pm
Or put another way:
http://www.usatoday.com/videos/news/politics/elections/2016/2016/09/21/90788476/
LikeLiked by 2 people
March 16, 2017 at 4:06 pm
Right! Very astute reference my friend! That was the only part of his speech I agreed with lol. Amazing how he was spot on in that regard but was still endorsing Trump. He exemplifies the “rich Negro” he just talked about.
LikeLiked by 2 people
March 16, 2017 at 4:09 pm
Exactly.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 16, 2017 at 4:39 pm
The first paragraph is just perfection. Black people can be so ashamed of their Blackness, and I will NEVER understand why. Terrific writing, my friend.
LikeLiked by 2 people
March 16, 2017 at 4:49 pm
For real! The twisting and turning goes to ridiculous lengths. It is at the point where I have heard people from Haiti – the first black republic and product of slave revolt – try to position themselves as something other than black. It’s embarrassing.
Thanks for the support ☺
LikeLiked by 2 people
March 16, 2017 at 5:07 pm
You’re welcome. 😏 Some Black folks while try everything they can to diminish their blackness, claiming to have ancestors from everywhere BUT Africa. Black folks are known to claim “I got Indian in my family!” Yeah, you may have Native American ancestors, but society sees you as Black. Everyone’s getting these supposed DNA tests in hopes of determining their European lineage. SMH.
LikeLiked by 2 people
March 16, 2017 at 5:17 pm
Exactly! That is the implicit promise these terms offer. People are dying to have a percentage of non-black blood.
I remember when I was 10 years old, I learned there was Cherokee on my father’s side of the family. I was excited. I ran to my paternal grandmother and said “nana, nana … I am part of the Cherokee tribe!” She was a no non-sense kind of woman, so she responded “yeah, and you are also part of the Monig tribe”. I looked at her confused, and asked “what’s that?” She said “you’re mo’ nigger than anything else”. Lol. She saw right through my bullshit and put me right back in my place. With my nappy hair and black features, it’s not even debatable!
LikeLiked by 2 people
March 16, 2017 at 6:49 pm
😂😂😂😂 You’re Grandmother kept it 100! Thankfully she gave you a reality check before America did.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 16, 2017 at 6:54 pm
Lol, yes always necessary!
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 16, 2017 at 6:49 pm
*Your* Typos!!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 18, 2017 at 11:47 pm
Darryl, this is so true. I don’t remember if we already had this conversation, but some comedian was talking about Tiger Woods in his act, back when he was calling himself CaBlaNAsian He said, “All I know is if the police say, ‘Nigga get on the ground,’ he better get down” lol You’ve made this point much more poignantly my friend.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 19, 2017 at 12:38 am
Thank you! Lmao @ CaBlaNAsian. Damn, I wish I remembered that for this piece! That is the most egregious example ever! And that comedian is spot on! 👏 So perfect! If the cops show up, he better ACT like he knows the drill. Ain’t nobody trynna hear that garbage!
I’m cracking up right now. Ya boy REALLY said CaBlaNAsian, though. With a straight face and everything 😂😂😂
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 23, 2017 at 4:14 pm
He shole did! I wanted to reach through the TV and choke the sh*t out of him! Seriously I did!
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 23, 2017 at 5:00 pm
LOL! The lengths people go to so as to avoid blackness are ridiculous!
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 21, 2017 at 2:50 pm
Hey Love 🙂
Ok, so I was JUST having this conversation with Chevvy who is from South Africa where they divvyed blacks up into categories of coloured and black (African). I told her that here in the US, (outside of New Orleans) white folks had no time for half white and all that mess. If you had a drop of black, you were black. “Hypodescent” is one of the technical terms for it..I think.
Of course, you know I have a whole series dedicated to our ‘biracial’ heritage. The reason we decided to talk about it was because we were told NOT to EVER acknowledge my Grandfather’s appearance. The secretiveness, in itself, became like a family issue that developed into it’s own entity.
Darryl, that thing was something serious down South during my father’s time growing up. They were mistreated by both black and white for being ‘other.’ As you know, mixed families were not very prominent back then so my father and his family stood out like a sore thumb. Don’t get me wrong, there were ‘mixed people’ but not living in a family with a mother who appeared ‘mixed’ and a father who appeared ‘white.’
Anyway, I enjoyed this piece. And even though my family has a ‘bi-racial’ family history, we ALL are black and we know it.
Always a pleasure my sweet!
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 21, 2017 at 3:16 pm
Hey Lady G! How are you!? Thanks for reading this! I remember and liked your series on biraciality. You are one of the few who is able to assert the fact of racial mixture while not forgetting the way you are seen at the end of the day:black.
Have you ever watched SportsCenter? There is a commentator who works for them named Sage Steele. She looks like a black woman. Yet she identities as “bi racial” or “mixed” (her mom is white, her father is black), always talks about having a white husband, and loves to lecture black people. I read some of her FB posts and it pissed me off so I had to respond lol.
You are right about South African apartheid and hypodescent. Glad you understand this. It is so exhausting to hear and/or read otherwise!
And P.S. Pardon my indulgence, but I think last week I told you about the architecture follow up piece I did. I would love to hear your thoughts on it, because we discussed the other one and I feel that you, as a fellow jokester, would appreciate it. It’s the one about architecture and parent child bedrooms (sorry, I cannot grab the link from my phone) ☺
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 22, 2017 at 1:26 pm
Thank you darling! I know EXACTLY what time it is! 🙂
Because of what you said here, I decided to google Sage Steele and I was VERY irritated with several of her comments. I simply cannot with her!
And there is NO indulgence on your part for informing me about a post that you know I would enjoy! I’ll be checking that one out shortly 🙂
I recently wrote a post on a closely related topic (colorism.) If you haven’t had a chance, may I ask that you give it a glance? 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 22, 2017 at 3:39 pm
“Similarly, a man with dark skin and kinky hair lives the experience of blackness. When a police officer sees his blackness and pulls him over for that reason and that reason only, it does not matter that he “is” 34% this or that. He has been identified as black. What now? Should he reach for his Ancestry results!? I wouldn’t advise it: that would just give the officer a reason to shoot him because – let’s face it – he was probably reaching for a gun!”
Very good post! You made some solid points!
LikeLiked by 2 people
March 23, 2017 at 12:55 pm
Thank you!
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 30, 2017 at 9:58 am
Man, you couldn’t have covered more grounds on this topic if you tried. I love how you compared the gains vs. lack of gains associated with different races with your hypothetical examples.
Although slightly different, they reminded me a bit of Rachel Dolezal and the whole debacle with her claiming her non-existent (or minimal – I don’t recall) black genes. She, like in your example, could benefit from turning her blackness (be it faux or not) on and off in ways that a bi-racial person with a less fair skin complexion could not. She believed herself to have lived a black experience that she could never have lived with such an ‘on’ and ‘off’ switch available to her.
Not only does it allow for this exoticism that you mentioned (which is extremely disturbing and exploitative in nature – an essay in it’s own), but it also gives a fictitious pass to cultural appropriation and degradation by whites who possess a false sense of identity and/or comradery. “I’m a part of the community too, so I have permission to say/do/speak on…”
Its super early for me but I hope you get where I’m going with that lol.
LikeLiked by 1 person
April 3, 2017 at 12:03 pm
I get exactly where you are going. Great connection to Rachel Dolezal. I wanted to speak on her as well. She is a prime example of this. She benefits from whiteness. It doesn’t matter how black her husband is, how black her kids are, or how black her new legal name is … she benefits from looking white. It’s rather simple, right? People need to stop giving her a platform to spew her garbage. She acts as if blackness is something you can hang from a coat rack lol.
LikeLike