For the past few months, airwaves have been saturated with allegations of covert Russian interference in America’s 2016 presidential election. Like a dog with a bone, teleprompter-jockeys are working tirelessly to ensure this claim becomes the explanation for Donald Trump’s ascendancy. The argument was given legitimacy with a report from the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), which concluded that Russian hackers influenced the election outcome. Today, Sally Yates is testifying about the role of Russia in the presidential elections.
There are at least three problems with this narrative. First, the fixation with foreign meddling overlooks the fact that America obstructs its own electoral process. Second, this reasoning downplays America’s interference – through the CIA – in the elections of sovereign nations around the globe for a century. Third, this version of events is an attempt to minimize the sex, race, and class-based fault lines that garnered overwhelming support for Trump in the first place.
Ways America Interferes in its Own Elections
Since the inception of this nation, roadblocks existed to prevent certain subsets of the population from voting. Women, non-whites (i.e. Asians, Native Americans, blacks), and those without property were originally barred from voting. These groups were selectively granted the franchise at different points in time.
Despite these laws, the contentious battle over the right to vote has not been resolved. There are at least three ways the American electoral process is internally sabotaged. First, people that were convicted of felonies are disenfranchised, to varying degrees, across the states. Consider the consequences imposed around the country:
- Permanent loss of voting rights (3 states)
- Loss of voting rights in prison (14 states)
- Cannot vote with some felony convictions (6 states)
- Loss of voting rights in prison and on parole (4 states)
- Cannot vote in prison or on parole; can vote after sentence is complete, including probationers (21 states)
- Everyone has the right to vote (2 states)
Due to felony disenfranchisement laws, 6.1 million Americans cannot vote. These laws have a disproportionate impact on black people due to racial bias in the criminal justice system. Consequently, 1 in every 13 black people is prohibited from voting due to a felony conviction. At the state level, these figures become even more drastic. In Florida, for example, 23% of African Americans are permanently unable to vote.
It is important to remember that Florida is a battleground state in presidential elections. The closest election in American history came down to Florida in 2000; where, after a recount and decision from the Supreme Court, George W. Bush won by only 537 votes. None of this would be necessary if ex-felons could vote at that time. Back then, there were 750,000 ex-felons barred from voting. Most felons are black, and black people vote overwhelmingly Democratic (95%+). It is safe to assume that if ex-felons were granted the franchise, the election outcome would’ve been different.
How did felony disenfranchisement impact the 2016 presidential election? Trump won Florida by just 112,000 votes. Reports estimate that there are 107,000 Floridians on parole or probation, and an additional 1.3 million ex-felons who cannot vote. Once again, since felons tend to be black and blacks tend to vote Democratic, the election outcome could’ve been different in Florida and other states, as well.
State governments disenfranchise felons, not Russia.
Second, 32 states require some form of voter identification at the polls. This means that a person is only able to cast a vote if they possess and show their state-issued ID card. However, a study of Pennsylvania showed that over 760,000 residents did not have this form of documentation. Such a mandate continues the legacy of Jim Crow by erecting additional barriers for the poor who cannot afford/access these materials. Additionally, the states with higher proportions of immigrant populations are more likely to impose these restrictions. We can only wonder how these laws skewed this election cycle.
Various state governments impose voter ID laws, not Russia.
Third, the Citizens United case granted corporations the right to dump ungodly sums of money into the American electoral process as a form of “speech”. Running for office requires a deep reservoir of money – known as a “war chest” – to advertise and campaign across the country. Corporations sign blank checks in exchange for political influence. Therefore, candidates are selected before they are elected. Americans are given the opportunity to vote on options that were already approved by capitalist overlords. The integrity of politicians is now thrown into question as most pledge allegiance to their corporate sponsors instead of the average American voter.
The federal government allows money in politics, not Russia.
Fourth, districts are often gerrymandered. This is a complex and disingenuous process of dividing territories to give one party a numerical advantage over another. Votes from certain demographics (i.e. typically race, or another proxy) are strategically concentrated in ‘blocks’ for inclusion, while others are excluded. The end result is that regions, from an aerial view, end up resembling jigsaw puzzles.
Various state governments gerrymander districts, not Russia.
The United States Interferes in Elections Across the Globe
America often frames itself as the global police officer who intervenes to prevent violence in other nations. A closer inspection of foreign policy, however, reveals that America does not care about the formations of dictatorships – it is only interested in profit for corporations. I will provide just three examples, although there are several more. Just a few years ago, declassified documents revealed that the CIA staged a coup to overthrow Prime Minister Mohammed Mossadegh from Iran in 1953, largely because he nationalized the oil fields. Moreover, in 1954, the CIA overthrew the democratically elected government in Guatemala because their reform policies threatened profit for the United Fruit Company. Further, the CIA overthrew democratically elected socialist Salvador Allende in Chile in 1973, because he was a threat to capitalist hegemony in the region.
The United States – through the CIA – routinely interferes in elections across the world. The investigation into Russian hackers by the CIA, then, should be taken with several grains of salt. America has been interfering in elections in the Middle East for the past 10+ years! This so-called intelligence agency has demonstrated its demonic expertise in destabilizing foreign nations and undermining elections, so we should be suspicious of their assessment that “Russia was involved in the 2016 election”.
Using Russia As a Scapegoat
Even if these claims were true, the narrative of Russian interference is a simple explanation for a complex phenomenon. Sexism, racism, and classism are organizing principles in the United States, and they undoubtedly exerted their influence in the election results. Donald Trump ran on an openly misogynistic, racist, xenophobic, and classist platform. When the demographics of Trump voters are examined, we find that he won 53% votes among white women; and a majority of the white working class. More shockingly, voter turnout for the presidential election was at a 20-year low. Only 55% of the American adult population cast a vote. These are American problems that cannot be laid at Russia’s doorstep.
We need to own this and stop trying to flee from an unpleasant reality. Instead of scapegoating a nefarious foreign enemy in front of a computer screen, we need to confront the failures of neoliberal economic policy and how it galvanized Trump supporters. We must have deeper conversations about the weaknesses of intersectional feminism and anti-capitalist theory which often fail to centralize those at the bottom of our socioeconomic ladder: black women. Pointing the finger at Vladimir Putin is disingenuous insofar as it seeks to blame cyber-security for a problem created and perpetuated by systemic injustice. We must view these accusations as an attempt to stabilize U.S. imperialism and global hegemony.
By: Darryl Walker, Jr.
December 12, 2016 at 5:57 pm
Hi Bro Darryl:
Where my food contracts at Brah? Ain’t we ‘posed to be getting this money?
LOL!
Naw, just kidding around 🙂
Here’s my real comment:
Excellent esposé as usual.
Here’s something that I’ve seen in my neck of the woods.
How ’bout they wanted to house one of the voting precincts in at The County Law Enforcement Division which houses Sheriff’s Deputies.
How’s that for intimidation?
Even if you don’t have a record that could be unsettling for some.
Seriously?
Guess what the racial make-up is in that precinct?
Like Brother Katt Williams says, “Don’t worry, I’ll wait…”
Anyway, flat-out, as for Trump voters. There are elements who couldn’t care less what he does as long as he Makes America Great Again which we ALL know is code for Make America White Again.
LikeLiked by 3 people
December 12, 2016 at 6:16 pm
*scratches back of head* you see, what had happened was … 😂😂
Thanks for always reading and commenting Lady G! 😀
Wow @ having a voting precinct at the County of Law Enforcement. That is textbook intimidation! I don’t have a criminal record but I am a black man so … I ain’t trynna be anywhere near police stations or anything of the sort. Find myself in cuffs for no reason at all. They got all types of slick strategies to disenfranchise us. This stuff is much prevalent where you are, but the North is following suit. They be claiming there’s a bunch of “voter fraud”, but the likelihood of that is like 0.0001%. It’s crazy!
What angers me is that Election Day is on a Tuesday and polls close at like 9pm, if you’re lucky. They know good and well minorities and women are much more likely to have to hold down 2 jobs – so they can’t even get to the polls in time! That’s the design!
You are definitely right that Make America Great Again is code for white dominance – that’s why he is appointing white nationalists and getting endorsements from the Klan.
LikeLiked by 2 people
December 12, 2016 at 6:20 pm
“What had happened was…”
LOl!!!
And what gets me is the fact that they can convince ANYBODY that precincts that service poor black and working class votes are susceptible to high incidence of voter fraud. Hell, most folks catch hell just trying to get one freaking vote in, let along adding trickery to it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 12, 2016 at 6:25 pm
For real! It’s ridiculous. In some counties near me, they had folks waiting in line for like 2 hours. Ain’t nobody got time for that! People just threw their hands in the air and said “forget it!” Who you know is about to stand outside in line for 2 hours to cast a fraudulent vote in their dead granddaddy’s name?!?!?!?! 😂 😂 doesn’t happen! lol
LikeLiked by 2 people
December 12, 2016 at 6:27 pm
ROTFLMAO!!!!!
That’s how you know it’s a bunch of BS!!!!!
We ain’t trying to do that!
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 12, 2016 at 6:29 pm
Lol for real!!
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 12, 2016 at 8:22 pm
Thanks for your excellent piece Daryl. Totally mind blowing facts and an undeniable assertion of the part racism plays in the US electoral process. Like, I knew it was there, I just didn’t know to what degree.
I’ve been in NYC for the last 3 months and saw the election finale (read: deblacle, fuck up). It really surprised me that the system is so prone to misuse and abuse by those running the race and a totally screwed up media propaganda wheel. I’m from the UK where we were able to take the government to the European Court of Human Rights in order to restore voting rights to those serving small sentences in jail. Although with the fuck up that is Brexit, who knows how long this will last. (Don’t GET me started!)
Anyway, in my time over here, one strange question I keep getting asked is which part of the world (country) do I think the US should be scared of in the future. I have my opinions, but they never included Russia, who, in my view, simply don’t have the power to do the things many Americans feel they could. My answer surprised those I spoke to. Russia seems to be the go to ‘superpower’ that will destroy the democracy that is the US. Still! After all these years, post Cold War, where that country you knew NO LONGER EXISTS! It really doesn’t. It has its own problems and issues that are, like other countries, very real to it. So I was again, surprised (stupidly it seems) when the media latched onto a Russian infiltration of the election results. This was proof of a cross state misunderstanding of the US system and showed a failure to look at, and admit to, a biased system that doesn’t not truly represent all its people and at this rate may never do.
Can I ask you, what your solution to the problem would be? How would you go about precipitating change? I understand this will may take years, generations to achieve, but what would you do?
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 12, 2016 at 8:51 pm
Hello Meya,
Thank you for reading and for your excellent comment! The question you are repeatedly asked is interesting! I agree with your answer. Even though Russia has, roughly, the same amount of nuclear warheads as the U.S., I do not think they are a threat UNLESS America provokes them. America imagines itself in competition with Russia (and China) for the spot as THE global superpower. All of this hysteria about Russian interference is an attempt to set the stage for a war. A lot of this is rooted in Cold War politics. I also think a lot of this anti-Russia talk is rooted in the fact that Edward Snowden exposed America and then ran to Russia – but Putin refused to extradite him. This was seen as providing a safe haven for a “traitor”.
You pose a great question about solutions to the problem. The answer depends upon one’s assessment of the problem. If we are speaking about millions of people being disenfranchised, some reformist suggestions would be: to raise mass awareness about the consequences of these policies, sign people up to vote and make sure they can get to the polling places, and to write representatives to repeal these laws. A revolutionary assessment would state that the electoral system is beyond redemption, and that we should not bother fixing it at all – as the entire structure needs to be destroyed & rebuilt. Personally, I think the system is beyond repair – and that we should capitalize on this raw political moment and the anger it produces by raising awareness. Change comes when conscious people demand it. So in a sense, a Trump presidency is good for waking people out of their slumber. I would go about precipitating change by educating people and organizing them into anti-racist, anti-capitalist, anti-sexist, etc groups where they can more effectively stage collective actions against the system (i.e. rallies), and actions that help build another system (i.e. develop mutual aid networks, etc).
What do you think some solutions are and how would you go about enacting them?
LikeLike
December 12, 2016 at 11:05 pm
Thank you Daryl 😁
My observations are based firstly on being an outsider, secondly coming from a different system, which is by no means perfect itself and thirdly having gained an opinion from watching how the world as a whole is currently going through some quite dark times.
I wish reforming the system was an option right now, but a larger part of me no longer believes this is the way forward. I have always been a pacifist in my heart, and looked to working with the system in order to bring about change. I now find it hard to continue to support this.
I don’t think the corruption within the US system is news to many people, from what I understand, the corruption has always been rife – it’s common knowledge. It’s also obvious that a cry for a ‘fair’ system will not change anything either. It has not been fair for centuries, why would those who would gain power and control want to change the status quo when it was serving them so well? The chance to strive for reform is, sadly a red herring in this day and age.
In the UK there have been calls for proportional representation through the electoral process for decades, as we vote on an archaic boundary system that means one party can actually gain the most overall votes but not enough within the boundaries to win the electorate outright. I think the US has a similar system.
There are also, as you mentioned, massive movements of money which allow corporations to purchase the premierships outright. How can the ‘people’ ever hope to buy themselves a fair vote? They would be competing with the 1% who have access to most of the money.
I look at other countries, France, Italy and Australia, and I see a right wing backlash heading their way too. All based on the fears of the White electorate for frankly having to fight in their ‘own’ countries for the things that used to come easy – jobs, housing, respect. All the things that those of us from other ethnic groups have had to push for our entire lives, despite having had generations of family and community dwelling in those countries. They find it an anathema that you or I could consider their country our own. I may sound like I am ranting a prejudiced diatribe, however, seeing my own country voting to get out of Europe with the main reason being immigration, I feel it is time to re-emphasise what we all went through in our histories to be where we are.
Tied in with the above is the appalling way the media propaganda machine sought to swerve voters through lying, false statistics and innuendo. They did nothing to help both you and I through our respective elections. They helped pray on people’s fears, paranoia and prejudice.
So, when all is said, I feel my only recourse is revolution! A drastic word for a necessary shake up of the status quo. To have all people who are disenfranchised by their current political systems to stand up and shout out loud that we won’t take it anymore.
The people have power. They have more than they think or have been led to believe. I’m not talking using violent means, I am not quite there yet! But using our numbers to achieve goals not linked to rat race, for example, creating our own system – banking, education, employment, (a friend of mine has this idea that if all of us removed our money from our banks on the same day, we could seriously harm the banking system). If we all took to the streets as a unified group, we could make enough noise. I look at social media and think there have to be better uses for it than telling people what you had for lunch – the results of the Arab sparring or the situation in Dakota. I know I am not the only one dissatisfied with the world as it is.
I effect, I think you and I are on similar wavelengths 😁
LikeLiked by 2 people
December 13, 2016 at 1:58 pm
Great points Meya! I agree with you that social media has a lot of potential. Through computers and cellphones, we are able to convey information at the drop of a hat to people across the world. This is powerful. One shortcoming is – as you noted – people using it solely for the sake of telling what they had for lunch. Another shortcoming is the fact that government authorities infiltrate social media as a way to surveillance potential uprisings. It is far too visible and legible. We will have to find ways to discuss that are off the radar and not subjected to regulation from the government.
I really like your point about reform being a red-herring. I disagree with the central premise of reform which is that the system only needs a bandage. The system is not broken – it working beautifully and it is working as designed. You cannot reform that. You need to destroy that. Reformist agendas are just fancy ways of begging the master. Sure, it helps to get higher wages and increased benefits – but whenever we ask for this, we are recognizing the master AS the master, so all we are doing is becoming happier slaves.
It was sad to see Brexit happen, even from the other side of the ocean. There is a right-wing wave going on in the world, and America is about to get a huge dose of what is currently hitting Austria. Will it be easier to organize people into the streets during a period where capitalism is running around naked, no mask anymore? Or will it become harder because people are so afraid and they have become indoctrinated by right-wing ideology?
I am glad we are on a similar wavelength! =D
LikeLiked by 2 people
December 15, 2016 at 3:52 pm
Hi Daryl,
Thanks amigo! Let’s hit em where it hurts!
One thing. Yes social media is monitored. Maybe more in the US than the UK as there is not the same backlash for unEnglish behaviour as unAmerican, which is tantamount to communism, fascism and any other negative ism! It’s used more for monitoring radicals.
My point is, perhaps a public voice is needed. As with most revolutions, heads will roll. History has taught us this. But undercover dealings will incur a far harsher penalty for those involved. Are what you and I talking about- feelings of disenfranchisement from the system, really so risqué that it would trigger such an astringent response? In many ways it’s already out there. The Occupy Movement is already founded on protesting against the corporate overlords, aren’t our conversations very similar?
Thanks Meya
LikeLiked by 2 people
December 15, 2016 at 4:46 pm
Hello Meya,
I am not so sure that undercover dealings will incur a far harsher penalty for those involved. I look at it like this: from the time we are born, we are monitored and regulated. When we are born, we are given first and last names that are immediately recorded and reported to the State. Back in the 1600s, people in a lot of towns did not have last names. There were 10 people named “Thomas” in one area. This posed a problem for the State, because it was not able to keep track of people or raise tax revenue. After a while, the State forced surnames upon people. The State forced people to take last names (i.e. typically their occupation or their area became their last name) for purposes of taxation and surveillance.
Moreover, back in the 1600s, the landscape of a lot of neighborhoods was disorganized. There were no meaningful roads or coherent paths that could be traveled. If you were not from an area, you were completely lost and had to rely upon a native. This meant that if there was a revolution against the State, the people in those areas had the upper-hand because they knew where to hide, where to attack from, etc. To maintain power over the masses, the State imposed a “grid” layout for cities: each street was neatly divided into little rectangles, and there was a main road that intersected the “side streets” at a clean, concise, right angle. The reason for this was so if there was ever a popular rebellion, the State could navigate any and all areas with little effort, and not have to rely on natives.
So, our very identities and the layouts of our cities are consequences of State regulation. If we are trying to battle the State, we have to subvert the ways in which we are made legible to the State. This means that we will have to start having more “undercover dealings” simply because they are illegible to the State. The US lost the war to Vietnam. The Vietnamese used the Tet Offensive: where they struck the enemy when they least expected it. This is a strategy we need to be mindful of.
I did not think the Black Lives Matter movement posed a serious threat to American hegemony but – activists were and are still monitored. So we should not underestimate the sensation of danger experienced by mere words – especially in a country that is phobic about “terrorists” at every turn (George W. Bush signed a law a while back which, in essence, allows anyone who critiques America to be classified as a terrorist). And Donald Trump was on Twitter a few weeks ago stating that anyone who burns the flag should lose their citizenship or receive a year in jail. So, in a way, I think these commentaries CAN be risque; we only find out that ARE after documents are declassified.
-Darryl
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 18, 2016 at 9:51 pm
Admittedly, this has given me much to ponder on. There are so many differences to the history of the creation of the US and the paranoia behind certain actions carried out throughout history. I never knew that about the cities. Again, as my only comparrisaon, most of Europe is not like that, cities are not in blocks more like spirals! The only time where this may not be the case is due to rebuilding areas that were bombed during the Second World War. Im getting the feeling that freedom of speech is more of a misnomer in the US than in Europe.
Im still learning about US history and feel I have a lot more to ponder on.
Thanks Daryl.
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 19, 2016 at 12:26 pm
Always a pleasure Meya! Happy Holidays ☺
LikeLike
December 13, 2016 at 1:33 pm
Wow this was fire man.
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 13, 2016 at 3:00 pm
Thanks bro I appreciate the feedback!
LikeLike
December 17, 2016 at 10:58 am
Darryl, excellent write up bruh! I agree with the analysis. Maybe the media and government are looking so hard at Russian hacks is due to Trump’s foreign policy stance on Russia and NATO. To me, this appears to be a big money fight behind the scene that is the hacking as a smokescreen. But I agree with all 3 points you made. I simply wanted to add, I believe this is about global disenfranchisement, not just disenfranchisement for minority groups in the US.
LikeLiked by 2 people
December 17, 2016 at 11:07 am
Bruh, lemme get in my PC to rewrite that post. The entry screen is too small on my phone to write out paragraphs and properly proof them.
LikeLiked by 2 people
December 17, 2016 at 12:03 pm
Cool, I look forward to hearing more of your thoughts!
LikeLike
December 17, 2016 at 12:16 pm
Well, looks like I won’t be updating that post. I can’t edit it. That’s cool! Hopefully the thoughts came through despite the grammatical hiccups.
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 17, 2016 at 12:20 pm
Looks good bro. It is definitely about money power and control. One of the dudes in Trump’s administration suggested that votes be based on the criteria of property ownership again smh
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 17, 2016 at 12:26 pm
And yet, no one is alarmed by this. Everyone is asleep bruh. Black, White, Purple, Green, Yellow, Orange. Well, maybe not orange, but everyone else is asleep. We are gonna wake up naked with everything missing inside the house, including the pajamas we went to sleep in. Lol.
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 17, 2016 at 12:53 pm
Lol. True story! Everyone is too worried about selfies and the Kardashians. Trump getting elected is the scariest thing ever. It’s real. People really need to wake up to this stuff
LikeLiked by 2 people
December 17, 2016 at 12:02 pm
Thanks for the support bro! This is most definitely a big money fight, and these “hacks” are a smokescreen. Good point about this being about global disenfranchisement (not just minorities, the poor are suffering everywhere). I agree 100%. What is happening in Africa and Latin America are laboratories for what will happen here soon, or is already happening here at some level. I opted to speak about the local scene because America is the only country sweating this Russian hack angle. In most countries, the masses of people are disenfranchised – but for the sake of getting the piece done in time (these essays take a while to do research on and compose!) and making it easy to understand to the average viewer, I have to cut corners.
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 17, 2016 at 12:24 pm
Werd! No I can see the effort, detail, and thorough thought you put into these pieces. I was probably dragging some local conversations I have into my response to your post. As African Americans, I find most of my peers are stuck on just our disenfranchisement vis-a-vis the civil rights movement. If they would only raise their gaze just a little bit higher to peep the game, then we wouldn’t simply continue to fall back on old school methods for change. Instead of attempting to pull together 12% of the US population, we could pull together 99% of the world’s population for change – and that’s a force to be reckoned with. Instead we have a meager ruling class pulling the same old rhetoric and okey-doke plays that cause the rest of us to fight over what’s falling off the table instead of focusing on pulling up a chair to the table, if not attempting to overturn the table.
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 17, 2016 at 12:50 pm
Absolutely. Great points! My goal with this post was to describe the problem, as opposed to prescribing a solution to it. Prescriptions belong to social movements in the streets, as opposed to bloggers on the net. So I try to bracket my analysis there, and have those conversations with my comrades when planning demonstrations and rallies or putting pressure on policymakers etc.
This Russian hacker angle is an attempt to muddy the waters and tell us that our enemy is on the other side of the Atlantic. Our enemy is, was, and always will be right here in America. I am more afraid of the cops than terrorists. I talked about disenfranchisement as a way to think about : who is our REAL enemy? It for damn sure ain’t Putin! I am glad you understand.
I like your seat at the table analogy. We definitely need to overturn it!
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 17, 2016 at 12:55 pm
Werd, Bruh! All in on everything you wrote here.
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 17, 2016 at 12:51 pm
And I like your international lens. I hate nationalism. We are all suffering under a common enemy. Very astute my dude!
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 17, 2016 at 12:12 pm
And lemme add (lol) , that Hillary and Podesta have connections to Russia via selling 20% uranium .. but no one is whining about that. So these hacks are a bit random and selective
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 17, 2016 at 12:15 pm
This is all about money, power, and control. Most, if not all of this has very little to do with the average person who doesn’t have any of the three. Lemme add on to that (lol).
LikeLike
December 18, 2016 at 9:42 pm
Wow! This has given me a lot to ponder on!
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 21, 2016 at 6:44 am
SO, how much it is true. Did Russian hackers helped trump to win this election?
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 21, 2016 at 7:07 am
Maybe, maybe not. But for the sake of discussion, lets take the CIA’s word at face value and say they did help Trump win. What I am suggesting here is that Russian hackers are not the SOLE reason Trump won. Some mischievous nerds behind a computer screen is not THE reason for this. Trump won because Hillary Clinton was a deeply flawed candidate who ran on a neoliberal platform that has been destroying the working class. Trump won in states that previously went to Obama. So a lot of Trump supporters are angry Obama voters. Trump won because millions of people were disenfranchised via voter ID laws, felonies, etc. Trump won because millions of voters loved the racism and sexism that came out of his mouth, and they want to bring these ideas to fruition. The reasons are internal (American problems not external (Russian scapegoats).
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 21, 2016 at 7:27 am
Russia have a terrible economy but the people over there are extremely tech savvy and they don’t have any way to be gainfully employed so they resort to cyber crime.
LikeLiked by 1 person
December 21, 2016 at 9:38 am
Interesting! But do you think that single-handedly won the election for Trump?
LikeLike
January 26, 2017 at 12:40 pm
“Therefore, candidates are selected before they are elected. Americans are given the opportunity to vote on options that were already approved by capitalist overlords.” EXACTLY!!!
America and on it’s high horse cracks me up! Our government agencies do all of this wicked stuff around the world then want to cry sheep. Get outta here! In the words of Jigga, “We don’t believe you, you need more people!” I literally don’t trust anything they put out in the media. Too many lies and falsehoods.
LikeLike
March 21, 2017 at 12:45 pm
You slaughetered this; outstanding work. I was thinking about wriing on this topic.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 21, 2017 at 12:47 pm
Thanks bro! Please write about this … my News Feed on FB is filled with this nonsense. The more the merrier, and I am sure you’ll do a great job. If you decide to, please let me know!
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 21, 2017 at 1:01 pm
Thanks, fam. Ill think about it. I got some personal stuff to take care of, which is stopping me from writing how I want.
Im not sure If I can do a better job than you did, but Id try.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 21, 2017 at 1:46 pm
I hope everything works out for you personally!
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 21, 2017 at 1:50 pm
Thanks, bro. I appreciate that.
LikeLike
March 21, 2017 at 1:02 pm
Ill say this much. The russian hacking story is a smokescreen,I feel like something more sinister happened or is going to happen.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 21, 2017 at 1:46 pm
My sentiments exactly! It’s a convenient explanation that mystifies more than it clarifies
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 21, 2017 at 1:51 pm
Exactly. I feel like its bordering on some WMD, George W Bush suff, from back in 2003.
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 21, 2017 at 10:27 pm
Great post and so true. They point the finger at Russia rather than deal with our own internal voting problems. Typical! It is like pointing a finger at ‘terrorism’ rather than dealing with problems of violence we have here in the US. There is always some other culprit — but if we look close we see the real culprit is the US government and powers that be. Also, no one can run for election unless they are able to spend millions of dollars? Third party candidates, forget it! There is so much wrong with this picture…
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 22, 2017 at 12:09 am
Thank you!
And you are right: there is always a culprit. The US government’s modus operandi never changes. They recycle the same garbage script time and time again, partly because it has been so successful! Most people just blindly accept the word of the government at face value, so why change the formula now?!
Its the same thing with terrorism, absolutely. The government creates the enemy it claims to be fighting (ISIS and Al Qaeda were created by the CIA). This allows them to suspend basic constitutional rights in the name of “national security” … all the while making us too afraid to ask questions. And of course, they make a pretty penny off the entire charade.
I feel this whole Russian interference angle is a convenient explanation drummed up by the Democrats. They are so lame lol. HRC ran a pathetic campaign. Her entire strategy was “vote for me because … well, at least I’m not Trump.” Having a system with only two major parties is one of the main problems, right!? But noo … lets not discuss that, lets talk about Putin *cue haunted house music*
Blaming Russia allows people to avoid the fact that our system is broken at all levels of operation. And they are always pushing the tired lie that those who voted for a Third Party are the reason Trump got in. Lol. Jill Stein got 0.07% of the vote. If we gave all of her votes in each state to Hillary instead, Clinton still would have lost to Trump. When will the Democratic Party admit: she was an awful candidate running on an awful platform in an awful system. That has absolutely nothing to do with Russia!
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 22, 2017 at 11:25 am
Yes, agreed. And if more people were actually ALLOWED to vote, then maybe 3rd party candidates would get a better chance! It is starting to surprise me that so many people (sheeple) are still ‘asleep’ in this whole thing! Blame Russia, blame ISIS but never blame the US government. We now even know from Wikileaks that the US government actually FUNDS ISIS. Our tax dollars are going to ISIS. Oh, but people would rather declare Julian Assange a ‘Russian spy’ than actually look at those TRUE Wikileaks documents. (I know because I have encouraged people to do so and they have rebuffed me.) But nonetheless, we must keep fighting the good fight. Perhaps when we are dead and gone America will finally wake up, in a few hundred years… Great thoughts as always Darryl!
LikeLiked by 1 person
March 23, 2017 at 7:46 am
Great analysis Darryl, for which many thanks.
So, what to actually do?
http://www.justicedemocrats.com
LikeLike
May 10, 2017 at 4:09 pm
Looks like these comments are from December 2016.
LikeLiked by 1 person
May 10, 2017 at 4:15 pm
Yes. I repost content sometimes. I reposted this one because of the Sally Yates testimony a couple of days ago
LikeLike
May 10, 2017 at 4:39 pm
oK, I thought I was reading something that had been mixed up by WordPress. Good post. You have hit a few nails right on the head. You are one of the “awoke” people, for sure, as are many of us.
LikeLiked by 1 person
May 11, 2017 at 10:59 pm
Thank you Ms. Elva 😀 I am glad you are “woke” as well. Each one needs to teach one
LikeLike